Sensitivity analysis of a caliper formed atomic force microscope cantilever based on a modified couple stress theory

Document Type : Reasearch Paper

Authors

• M. Abbasi ¹
• N. Abbasi ²

¹ School of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

² Medicine Department, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

10.7508/ijnd.2016.01.006

Abstract

A relationship based on the modified couple stress theory is developed to investigate the flexural sensitivity of an atomic force microscope (AFM) with assembled cantilever probe (ACP). This ACP comprises a horizontal cantilever, two vertical extensions and two tips located at the free ends of the extensions which form a caliper. An approximate solution to the flexural vibration problem is obtained using the Rayleigh–Ritz method. The results show that the sensitivities of AFM ACP obtained by the modified couple stress theory are smaller than those evaluated by the classical beam theory at the lower contact stiffness. The results also indicate that the flexural sensitivities of the proposed ACP are strong size dependant when the thickness of the cantilever is close to the material length scale, especially at lower contact stiffness. Furthermore, the greatest flexural modal sensitivity occurs at a small contact stiffness of the system, in which the ratio of the cantilever thickness to the material length scale and the distance between the vertical extensions are also small. In this situation, the distance between the vertical extensions and the clamped end of the cantilever and also the vertical extensions lengths are large. The results reveal that the sensitivity of the right sidewall tip is higher than that of the left one.

Keywords

• Assembled cantilever probe
• Atomic force microscope
• Modified couple stress theory
• Rayleigh–Ritz method
• size dependent

20.1001.1.20088868.2016.7.1.6.6

Main Subjects

• Microscopy Analysis
• Nanotechnology

---

References

[1] Holmberg K., Matthews A. (1994). Coatings tribology: properties, techniques and applications in surface engineering. Appl. Surf. Chem. 95: 23-35.

[2] Mazeran P. E., Loubet J. L., (1999), Normal and lateral modulation with a scanning force microscope, an analysis: implication in quantitative elastic and friction imaging. Tribology Lett. 7: 199-212.

[3] Giessibl F. J., , (2003), Advances in atomic force microscopy. Rev. Modern Phys. 75: 949-983.

[4] Garcia R., Perez R., (2002), Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods. Surf. Sci. Rep. 47: 85-89.

[5] Fang T. H., Chang W. J., (2003), Effects of AFM-based nanomachining process on aluminum surface. Phys. Chem. Solids. 64: 913-918.

[6] Chang W. J., Fang T. H. , Weng C. I. , (2006), Nanoindentation and nanomachining characteristics of gold and platinum thin films. Mat. Sci. Eng. 44: 430-435.

[7] Bhushan B. (2008). Nanotribology and Nanomechanics, an introduction, Germany: Springer.

[8] Abbasi M., Karami Mohammadi A., (2014), A Detailed Analysis of the Resonant Frequency and Sensitivity of Flexural Modes of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with a Sidewall Probe Based on a Nonlocal Elasticity Theory. Strojni.ki vestnik - J. Mech. Eng. 60: 179-186.

[9] Turner J. A., Wiehn J. S., (2001), Sensitivity of Flexural and Torsional Vibration Modes of Atomic Force icroscope Canti levers to Surface St iffness Variation. Nanotech. 12: 322-330.

[10] Lee H. L., Chang W. J., (2008), Coupled lateral bendingtorsional vibration sensitivity of atomic force microscope cantilever. Ultramicros. 108: 707-711.

[11] Abbasi M., Karami Mohammadi A., (2009), Effect of contact posit ion and tip properties on the flexural vibration responses of atomic force microscope cantilevers. IREME. 3: 196-202.

[12] Abbasi M., Karami Mohammadi A., (2014), Study of the sensitivity and resonant frequency of the flexural modes of an atomic force microscopy microcantilever modeled by strain gradient elasticity theory. P I MECH ENG C-J MEC. 228: 1299-1310.

[13] Horng T. L., (2009), Analyses of vibration responses on nanoscale processing in a liquid using tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256: 311-317.

[14] Cuberes M. T., Briggs G. D., Kolosov O. , (2001), Nonlinear Detection of Ultrasonic Vibration of AFM Cantilevers in and out Contact with Sample. Nanotech. 12: 53-59.

[15] Abbasi M., Karami Mohammadi A., (2010), A new model for investigating the flexural vibration of an atomic force microscope cantilever. Ultramicros. 110: 1374-1379.

[16] Dai G., Wolff H., Pohlenz F., Danzebrink H. U., Wilkening G., (2006), Atomic force probe for sidewall scanning of nano- and microstructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88: 171908.

[17] Chang W. J., Lee H. L., Chen,T. Y., (2008), Study of the sensitivity of the first four flexural modes of an AFM cantilever with a sidewall probe. Ultramicros. 108: 619-624.

[18] Kahrobaiyan M. H., Ahmadian M. T., Haghighi P., Haghighi A., (2010), Sensitivity and resonant frequency of an AFM with sidewall and top-surface probes for both flexural and torsional modes. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 52: 1357-1365.

[19] Dai G., Wolff H., Weimann T., Xu M., Pohlenz F., Danzebrink H. U. , (2007), Nanoscale surface measurements at sidewalls of nano- and micro-structures. Meas. Sci. Tech. 18: 334-341.

[20] Kong S., Zhou S., Nie Z., Wang K., (2008), The sizedependent natural frequency of Bernoulli.Euler micro beams. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 46: 427-437.

[21] Mc Farland A. W., Colton J. S., (2005), Role of material microstructure in plate st iffness wi th relevance to microcantilever sensors. J. Micromech. Microeng. 15: 1060-1067.

[22] Fleck N. A., Muller G. M., Ashby M. F., (1994), Strain gradient plastici ty: theory and experiment . Acta Metallurgica et Materialia. 42: 475-487.

[23] Mindlin R. D., Tiersten H. F., (1962), Effects of couplestresses in linear elasticity. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.11: 415-448.

[24] Toupin, R. A., (1962), Elastic materials with couple stresses. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 11: 385-414.

[25] Koiter W. T., (1964), Couple stresses in the theory of elasticity. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. (B) 67: 17-44.

[26] Yang F., Chong A. C. M., Lam D. C. C., Tong P., (2002), Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity. Int. J. Solids and Struc. 39: 2731-2743.

[27] Park S. K., Gao X. L., (2006), Bernoulli. Euler beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. J. Micromech. Microeng. 16: 2355-2359.

[28] Ma Q., Clarke D. R., (1995), Size dependent hardness of silver single crystals. J. Mater. Res. 10: 853-863.

[29] Ke L. L., Wang Y. S., Yang J., Kitipornchai S., (2011), Nonlinear free vibration of size-dependent functionally graded microbeams. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 50: 256-267.

[30] Kahrobaiyan M. H., Asghari M., Rahaeifard M., Ahmadian M. T., (2010), Investigation of the size-dependent dynamic characteristics of atomic force microscope microcantilevers based on the modified couple stress theory. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 48: 1985-1994.

[31] Lee H. L., Chang W. J., (2011), Sensitivity of V-shaped atomic force microscope cantilevers based on a modified couple stress theory. Microelec. Eng. 88: 3214-3218.

[32] Lee H. L., Chang W. J., Yang Y. C., (2005), Flexural sensitivity of a V-shaped cantilever of an atomic force microscope. Mater. Chem. Phys. 92: 438-442.

[33] Beer F. P., Johnston E. R., (1981), Mechanics of Materials, New York: McGraw-Hill.